Search This Site
Forest on Twitter

TFS on Twitter

Join Forest On Facebook

Featured Video

Friends of The Free Society

boisdale-banner.gif

IDbanner190.jpg
GH190x46.jpg
Powered by Squarespace
Tuesday
Nov162010

Smoking, pregnant women and their criminal offspring

I've been sitting on a new study (published today in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health) and I can reveal (cue drum roll) that "Mums who smoke heavily while pregnant run the risk of having kids who grow up to become repeat criminal offenders, research suggests".

I'm not making this up. According to the press release:

The findings showed that children whose mothers had smoked heavily during the pregnancy were the most likely to have a criminal record as an adult.

They had a 30% increased chance of having been arrested, and this applied to women just as much as it did to men.

The findings held true, even after taking account of a comprehensive range of family and social factors, such as mental ill health and deprivation, which are likely to influence behaviours, the research showed.

“While we cannot definitively conclude that maternal smoking during pregnancy (particularly heavy smoking) is a causal risk factor for adult criminal offending, the current findings do support a modest causal relationship,” conclude the authors.

I'm speechless, so I'll quote my source: "It must be true: it's peer reviewed."

See: Study claims heavy smoking during pregnancy can lead to a life of criminality (Liverpool Daily Post). Click HERE to view the paper in full.

Monday
Nov152010

England's World Cup bid distances itself from free press

The Press Association reports that England 2018 bid leaders have sent a letter to all Fifa executive committee members to try to repair the damage caused by two media investigations into World Cup bidding.

The letter states: "We hope England's bid will not be judged negatively due to the activities of individual media organisations, regardless of one's view of their conduct. We hope you appreciate that we have no control over the British media."

The investigations into alleged corruption within football's world governing body Fifa have been carried out by the BBC current affairs programme Panorama and the Sunday Times. How pathetic to see British administrators grovelling at the feet of all those [insert your own words as long as they're not libellous] who "run" world football.

If that's what it takes to win the World Cup bid, you can stick it.

PS. I felt the same about our Olympic bid but at least Lord Coe & Co didn't sink this low. I feel physically sick.

Monday
Nov152010

Forget the law, ASH is a fake charity and here's why

A couple of weeks ago, following the publication of a Forest report about the use of public money to fund anti-smoking quangos and charities such ASH (and a subsequent piece by Rod Liddle in the Sunday Times), there was a mildly heated discussion about the issue HERE.

True to his word, one of the protagonists, Blad Tolstoy, has written a document that tackles "some common misconceptions about charities" including ASH, and an interesting document it is too. Click HERE.

That said, I really don't agree with Blad's criticism of the label "fake charity". I accept the argument that it won't "stand up to legal scrutiny" but it's a useful tool nevertheless because it differentiates between those charities that genuinely try to help people and those that seek to denormalise them, as ASH does.

Last week I was quoted in a retail trade magazine. "Tobacco control groups are no longer interested in educating people about the health risks of smoking," I said. "Their strategy is to denormalise and stigmatise adults who consume a legal product."

Today the tobacco control lobby is more interested in coercing people to quit smoking, with groups such as ASH using every "confidence trick" in the book to achieve their goal of a "smokefree" (sic) world.

Illiberal smoking bans, display bans, claims that smokers are harming (and even killing) those around them - this has nothing to do with health and everything to do with denormalising not only a legal product but the consumers of that product.

Thanks to charities like ASH, many people's social lives have been ruined, businesses have closed and jobs have been lost. I fail to see what's "charitable" about that and for that reason alone I am happy to call ASH a fake charity.

But there's another reason (and it has nothing to do with the millions of pounds of public money that ASH has received, which neatly avoids the need to do any traditional fundraising).

For years the tobacco control industry has been winning the war of words with unscientific yet emotive terms such as "passive smoking", "secondhand smoke" and so on. Language, as anyone knows, plays an important role in what I call PR and others call the battle for hearts and minds. If that means using some emotive terms of our own, then so be it.

Ultimately, though, the war on tobacco is a battle of ideas that won't be won or lost by debating or challenging ASH's charitable status. It's a side issue and a fairly unimportant one. I won't be losing any sleep over it and I suggest that you don't either.

Sunday
Nov142010

Archive: interview with Forest's first director, Stephen Eyres

Amazing what you find in the course of a clear-out. A long-lost issue of Campus, the student magazine I edited from 1978-80 and again from 1983-84, has turned up. To my surprise it includes an interview I did with Stephen Eyres, one of my predecessors and the first director of Forest, in 1984. I thought you might like to read it:

THE WIT AND THE WISDOM OF ... STEPHEN EYRES

"I really wish we didn't exist."

In a small South London office surrounded by news cuttings, posters, pamphlets and empty coffee mugs, sits a tall, distinguished yet cheerful-looking gentleman. As he speaks he leans back in his chair and proudly fondles the thick dark growth on his upper lip, a recent and much loved innovation unashamedly described as "a sign of middle age".

The room exudes an air of calm before the storm (Channel 4 is due to interview him that afternoon), with the silence broken only by the rat-a-tat-tat of a single typewriter and the muffled roar of traffic outside.

Stephen Eyres, archetypal chinless Tory, is the charismatic director of Forest (Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco), a libertarian pressure group best known for its successful campaign to make British Rail re-think a smoking ban in buffet cars.

Ironically Eyres is a non-smoker. "I occasionally have a cigar at the end of a banquet," he says, "because I like the aroma. But I have frequently said that I am a happy passive smoker of other people's cigars!"

Forest was founded in 1979, apparently on the whim of Air Chief Marshal Sir Christopher Foxley-Norris, an ex-Battle of Britain pilot who took grave exeption when told, by a lady at Reading railway station, what he could do with his pipe. Two years later he was joined by Eyres who quit The Freedom Association to help the cause.

Consequently Forest has emerged as an active, non-partisan pressure group with support from both sides of the political spectrum. One of Forest's biggest supporters, he says, is Labour MP Roy Mason whose avowed intention is to "defend the interests of the working man".

Those who want to ban smoking are described by Eyres as "busybodies". He is particularly alarmed at any attempt by the state to dictate to people what they can and cannot do. "Seventeen million adults in the UK choose to smoke. That's their business, not the state's. What will they outlaw next? Obesity?"

Forest is currently funded by the tobacco industry and private subscribers. Eyres is contemptuous of anti-smoking lobbies, especially those such as ASH and the Health Education Council which are heavily subsidised by the taxpayer, the latter by over £2m last year.

Lest some people get the wrong idea, he adds, somewhat defensively, "We are not encouraging people to smoke. It's a question of politics and philosophy, not medicine. I don't debate about cancer or heart disease but about the role of the state and the rights of authority."

But what about the rights of non-smokers? "Of course, smoking in confined spaces can be unpleasant and annoying to non-smokers so smokers must exercise due courtesy to the wishes of the non-smoker. But courtesy is not a matter for government legislation."

Ultimately, says Eyres, the question of smoking is one of property rights - that is, what happens on private property is the business of the owner alone. All one needs, he argues, are sensible and representative restrictions such as those on buses where smokers sit on the top deck.

"Total bans," he says, "are completely unworkable anyway. Grampian Regional Council tried to ban all smoking on buses but it is patently not working."

Public support, he claims, is firmly on Forest's side. Even though only 40 per cent of the population now smoke, independent opinion polls conducted in various parts of the country last year suggest that two-thirds of all adults, including non-smokers, want to keep their freedom to choose. Only a quarter want smoking banned in public.

The dramatic decrease in the number of smokers is due, he believes, to the sharp increase in the price of cigarettes over the last decade, plus a new phenomenon which he calls "health nagging".

Whatever the politics of Forest, and Eyres is adamant that it is non-party political, those of the director himself are unequivocally Thatcherite. Having graduated from St Andrews University in 1970, a period he recalls with horror as the "dark years of Heath", he first worked for the Selsdon Group ("fighting to keep the free-market philosophy alive") and later as a tutor at Swinton Conservative College until its closure in 1975 when party funds ran dry.

Not long afterwards he joined Norris McWhirter's right-wing Freedom Association, eventually becoming editor of the Freedom Association newspaper Free Nation.

"One of our finest moments," he recalls, "coincided with the TUC Day of Action in 1980." With Fleet Street newspapers grounded, The Freedom Association printed and sold a quarter of a million copies of Free Nation via a network of newsagents.

This special issue was a great success. It even included the obligatory topless model. Needless to say it was one of the most popular, and controversial, items prompting the inevitable reaction from frustrated feminists. To one Eyres is said to have replied, "Madam, if she was being fucked by a donkey you would have a case."

With his proven commitment to the free market, Eyres has also stood for Parliament on three occasions, albeit unsuccessfully. He reserves his fondest memories for his 1974 campaign in Central Fife where he fought the sitting Labour MP, Willie Hamilton, on a platform of de-nationalising the mines.

The issue aroused great interest and debates between Eyres and the Communist candidate attracted audiences of up to a thousand bemused miners.

Further defeats in 1979 and 1983 have forced Eyres to concede that a parliamentary career may have passed him by. "No-one else will have me," he wails. Not that he intends being idle. "So long as professional busybodies are trying to control our lives there has to be a response," he says firmly.

"I'd also like to campaign against restrictive licensing laws," he adds. "The other side are such awful puritans. If they had their way we'd all be drinking herbal tea and eating All-Bran with compulsory aerobics in between."

With people like Stephen Eyres around, that time should be some way off yet.

Postscript: this interview was published in 1984. Stephen Eyres died in 1990 of a non-smoking related disease. He was 42.

Sunday
Nov142010

The BBC, Maggie and me

Well, the skip is now full (see previous post) but the garage is no less cluttered than it was before.

The problem is, there are some things I'm not allowed to throw out (toys, bicycles, a cot and a family-sized tent that will never ever be used again) and loads of stuff that I don't want to throw out (books, an antique pine wardrobe, my old vinyl records ...).

I've got copies of The Spectator going back to 1975 and this morning, under a black plastic groundsheet, I found a stack of newspapers with headlines such as 'Maggie comes out swinging' (Daily Mail, May 14, 1983), 'Thatcher resigns' (London Evening Standard, November 22, 1990), and - the day after she stood down - 'Too damn good for the lot of them' (Daily Mail, November 23, 1990).

In a box at the back of the garage I also found a copy of the Independent on Sunday dated March 4, 1990, two months after the paper was launched. The front page features the following headlines: 'Thatcher fails to calm Tory nerves', 'Commons to investigate secret payments to MPs' and 'BBC's right-wing critic failed to secure trainee's job'.

The man who started the latest BBC controversy by accusing the Today programme of bias was turned down by the corporation when he applied for a job as a trainee journalist.

Simon Clark, director of the Media Monitoring Unit ... has written several reports critical of BBC standards of balance and impartiality.

On his early ambitions to join the BBC [Clark] said: "I tried to join the scheme they have for young reporters and I completely mucked up my interview. They asked me questions like, 'What do you know about Tibetan politics during the last 20 years?' and I had to admit not a lot."

That's right, my casual, light-hearted 'confession' that I had failed to get past the first interview stage when I applied for a job as a trainee reporter with the BBC after leaving university in 1980 ended up as a lead story in a national newspaper!!

The good news is that on the front page, directly below a large picture of Margaret Thatcher is a photo of, er, me.

Throw that out? Never. I think I'll have it framed.

Saturday
Nov132010

What a rubbish day

This time last week I was in Dublin recovering from a nine-hour lunch the previous day. Today I shall be in my garage throwing years of accumulated rubbish into a skip. If I find anything that is remotely interesting I'll let you know.

Friday
Nov122010

Reduce tobacco taxation to maximise revenue

The smokers' group Forest Eireann has welcomed comments by a Fine Gael Senator highlighting the negative effect of increasing tobacco taxation. But spokesman John Mallon pointed out that this is not just an issue of law enforcement ... See HERE.

Thursday
Nov112010

Spot the difference

Squeeze released an album last month called Spot The Difference. It features re-recorded versions of their best known songs that are extremely faithful to the originals. (You may think this is a pointless exercise but the Independent explains why they've done it HERE.)

I mention this (cue tenuous link) because I challenge you to spot the difference between the ASH Scotland press release that announced their Up In Smoke study and some of yesterday's media reports. (Mark Butcher, commenting on my previous post, wrote, "What really gets my goat is so many of the papers just regurgitate all these press releases in full". Quite.)

Equally culpable are websites such as eGov Monitor, "a Policy Dialogue Platform". Policy Dialogue is part of Policy Governance Media Limited which is described as "an independent media company that provides neutral platforms to facilitate open dialogue among stakeholders on public policy and encourage innovation and excellence in governance that enables and equips citizens and businesses to enjoy a better quality of life".

Neutral platform? As far as I could tell they had merely recycled ASH Scotland's press release. So I clicked on the 'feedback' button and suggested that it would have been rather more neutral if they had included an alternative point of view. I didn't expect a reply but late last night an email popped into my inbox:

Simon

As always our goal is to highlight all perspectives (within reason of course) and we will include [your quote] in the news item tomorrow.

The Editorial Team
eGov monitor - A Policy Dialogue Platform

Fair play to them for responding. I just wish that I didn't have to spend what feels like half my life chasing journalists to do what they should have done in the first place.

Click HERE.

13:00 ... They're not in a hurry, it seems, to update the news item with my quote.

Wednesday
Nov102010

ASH Scotland: the cost of smoking

According to a new "economic report" published today by ASH Scotland, the costs of tobacco in Scotland each year are estimated at:

  • £271m in direct NHS costs of treating smoking-attributable disease
  • £692m in productivity losses due to excess absenteeism, smoking breaks and lost output due to premature death
  • £60m in lost output to premature deaths due to second-hand smoke in the home
  • £34m in cleaning cigarette litter from the streets
  • £12m in fires caused by smoking in commercial properties

The BBC has the story HERE, including a quote from me. Ditto the Scotsman HERE.

I am reminded, when I read these fanciful statistics, of comments made by the the late Lord Harris, chairman of Forest, 1987-2006. Ralph's great love (apart from his wife and his pipe!), was the Institute of Economic Affairs which he ran from 1957-1988, becoming founder president in 1990.

In 2005, in a booklet published by Forest entitled Smoking Out The Truth: A Challenge to the Chief Medical Officer, Ralph wrote:

Sticking with dubious economics, [the CMO's] 2004 annual report further claims that smokefree workplaces would bring annual benefits of up to £2,700 million. Although he dismisses any testimony from the tobacco industry as tainted, he relies on the Department of Health’s own staff obligingly to serve up figures from unrevealed sources on such ‘costs’ as smoking-related absenteeism (£70-140 million), smoking breaks (£430 million), and ‘health benefits’ (precisely £2,171million).

On top of such wild estimates of benefits, his tame economists conjure up two disbenefits: one hard-looking figure of £1,145 million as lost tax to the Exchequer (presumably from an assumed reduction in cigarette sales), and another wholly esoteric invention of ‘loss of satisfaction’ to smokers (£700 million). I would not embarrass the CMO by asking how seriously he expects us to take such home-produced figures on the benefits of banning smoking!

If Ralph was alive today I am sure he would have something similar to say about ASH Scotland's "dubious economics". Meanwhile I will not embarrass chief executive Sheila Duffy by asking how seriously she expects us to take these latest calculations on the benefits of tobacco control in Scotland.

Smoking Out The Truth is available via the Recommended Reading page of the Forest website.

Up in Smoke: The cost of tobacco in Scotland is available HERE.

Monday
Nov082010

A small step for liberty, a giant leap for Forest Eireann

The broadsheet Irish Times today published a letter by John Mallon, our spokesman in Ireland. John's letter was in response to a letter by the chairman of ASH Ireland which was in response to THIS excellent article by columnist Ann Marie Hourihane.

If you know anything about the stranglehold the tobacco control industry has on the news media (in particular) in Ireland you will understand what an important breakthrough this is. You can read the full correspondence HERE.

Monday
Nov082010

MP hails victory for Dutch smokers

Brian Binley, MP for Northampton South and a supporter of the Save Our Pubs & Clubs campaign, has again called on the Coalition Government to review the smoking ban "in light of the decision made in Holland to allow some pubs to reintroduce smoking".

Binley said: "The Dutch Government held their promise and reviewed the smoking ban two years after its implementation. The British Government must change their approach to this issue and review the matter as the previous Government said that it would. I am delighted by the decision in Holland to allow smokers back into the pub and it is a good sign for the mounting campaign in Britain."

Above: Brian Binley at the Great British Pub Awards 2010 in September

Monday
Nov082010

The world of Auberon Waugh

Looking forward to reading Kiss Me, Chudleigh: the World According to Auberon Waugh edited by William Cook.

I've been catching up on some of the reviews in the New Statesman and elsewhere and they have reminded me why Waugh was my favourite journalist when I was a student in the late Seventies and he had regular columns in The Spectator and Private Eye.

I have written before about how thrilled I was to meet him, shortly after I became director of Forest, and how he persuaded me (although I didn't need much persuading) to sponsor a series of rather louche drinks parties at The Academy Club (which he founded) in Lexington Street, Soho.

Furnished with wooden tables and chairs and the smallest bar you ever saw, the Academy Club consisted of a single room which Dickens would have recognised. During our parties it would be thick with tobacco smoke and it was no coincidence that the most popular seats were the ones next to the open sash windows!

Bron would invite contributors to the Literary Review (which he edited), Forest would invite some of our contacts, and one or two guests would simply appear. As a result journalists and authors would mingle with politicians, campaigners and out-of-work actresses in what I can only describe as a den of hedonism, though perhaps my memory is playing tricks.

What I do recall very well is meeting Claire Fox of the Institute of Ideas and we have remained friends ever since.

Sadly Bron died in January 2001 and it was only then that I discovered that he had lived for 40 years with just one lung, having lost the other as a result of an accident during National Service.

Following his funeral on January 24, 2001, the Telegraph obituary noted:

At the end of the service a retiring collection was taken for the Howard League for Penal Reform, one of Waugh's favourite charities, although his family said that they had considered giving it to Forest, the pro-smoking organisation which the satirist had long supported.

Sunday
Nov072010

Their own worst enemy

I am trying hard to be supportive of electronic cigarettes, I really am. Having read some of the comments on this blog when the subject has come up, I think they are a genuine alternative to cigarettes in places where smoking is banned.

I would object strongly if anyone tried to prohibit them. (As far as I can tell, the only reason some campaigners want e-cigarettes outlawed is because they, er, look like cigarettes - from a distance.)

Sometimes, though, the people promoting e-cigs are their own worst enemy. Last week, for example, someone called ElectronicCigFan added the following comment on my post about Nick Clegg choosing "a stash of cigarettes" as his luxury item on Desert Island Discs:

"Not sure a cigarette is a 'luxury' item, particularly with all the damage they do to your body!"

Fair enough. ElectronicCigFan is entitled to his point of view and I have no wish to censor an honest opinion.

But then I noticed that he had added the following URL - www.smokestik.com - and I thought, "Uh-oh".

Look, I have no problem with people saying how wonderful or how horrible e-cigs are (the jury seems to be out), but please don't use this blog as a crude marketing tool.

Saturday
Nov062010

Dutch courage

Interesting - and encouraging - that the Sun should publish THIS interview with Wiel Maessen, spokesman for Red de Kleine Horecaondernemer (KHO), translated as the Foundation To Save Small Bar Owners.

Wiel is a long-term smokers' rights activist in the Netherlands. The lesson, however, of the success of the Dutch campaign against the smoking ban was the alliance between campaigners like Wiel and small bar owners whose businesses were under threat.

Hence the importance of our own Save Our Pubs & Clubs campaign which is designed to create a similar alliance. I will comment further when I get back from Ireland.

Friday
Nov052010

Flight 205 now boarding

I am currently in the departure lounge at Stansted airport waiting to board an early morning flight to Dublin ... Lunch and then (I am guessing) the rest of the day in the pub. Strictly business, of course ...

Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 107 Next 15 Entries »