University challenged

There have been over 100 responses to the Scottish Health and Sport Committee’s call for evidence in respect of the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Bill. See HERE. Forest's submission can be viewed HERE.

As a graduate of Aberdeen University I am curious to know why "The University of Aberdeen believes that the measures proposed to eliminate sale of tobacco product displays and vending machines are both justifiable as are the associated penalties". Full response HERE.

The University's submission is signed by Professor Stephen Logan, Senior Vice-Principal. As far as I can tell, no other university has responded to the call for evidence. Why Aberdeen? What the does a bill to ban the display of tobacco have to do with this ancient university, founded in 1495? And on whose authority, other than Prof Logan, was their feeble "evidence" submitted?

I think we should be told.

PS. I have emailed the university requesting a response. Don't hold your breath.